The Odyssey Read-Along @ Plethora of Books
Book XIII
![]() |
| Minerva (Athena) Jacques-Louis Dubois (19th century) source Wikimedia Commons |
Book XIV
![]() |
| Uysses attacked by the dogs of Eumea Louis-Frederic Schützenberger (1886) source Wikimedia Commons |
![]() |
| Minerva (Athena) Jacques-Louis Dubois (19th century) source Wikimedia Commons |
![]() |
| Uysses attacked by the dogs of Eumea Louis-Frederic Schützenberger (1886) source Wikimedia Commons |
And so begins our Candide Read-Along, hosted by Fariba at Exploring Classics. I was slightly intimidated by this novel but, after doing some research, I feel much more confident that I’ll be able to understand the main points of the novel. That said, this novel, because of it’s satirical nature and specific satirical targets, deserves an introduction.
Introduction
Published when Voltaire was 66 years old, Candide was expressly written to satirize the philosophy of Optimism. This optimism was not simply the positive hope of better circumstances, but the belief that everything that happened was for the best, no matter if good or bad, happy or tragic. This philosophy disgusted Voltaire because he felt that it left no facility for bettering oneself or one’s surroundings and that it supported fatalism and complacency. The tragic earthquake in Lisbon in 1755 seemed to precipitated the writing of this novel, causing the author to question justice in such a calamity, and reflected in his poem, “Poem on the Disaster of Lisbon,” written weeks afterward. Candide was further emphasis of Voltaire’s rejection of the attitude that life was the “best of all possible worlds” and that everything that happened in it was for the best.
![]() |
| Voltaire detailed portrait by Maurice Quenton de la Tour source Wikipedia |
Voltaire was an established writer and thinker by the time he wrote Candide, yet a controversial figure who by many was both admired and hated. He was continuously clashing with the government and the church, suffering two periods of incarceration, and most of his adult life was spent exiled from Paris, the city of his birth. Much of his works were published under a pseudonym to avoid prosecution. During a stint in exile, he spent three years in Great Britain and, impressed with the freedoms of England, particularly that of speech, his stay intensified his desire for reforms in his home country. In 1758 he settled in Ferney in eastern France, spending his time farming, writing and supporting local business. Candide was written here, not long after his move.
Chapter 1
Candide, a young man with “sound judgement and great simplicity of mind,” lives in the household of the Baron Thunder-ten-tronckh. It is suspected that he is a child of the baron’s sister and a neighbourhood nobleman. With a innocent susceptibility, he accepts his tutor, Pangloss’ teaching of “everything is necessarily for the best purposes.” Cunegonde, the baron’s daughter espies Pangloss dallying with a maid, decides she wants to repeat the experiment with Candide, but they are caught in the act of caressing by the baron and Candide is literally booted from the house.
Voltaire’s sarcasm is apparent in his treatment of the baron. He gives his castle a pretentious name, makes the baron important merely because he has a castle with doors and windows and praises the baroness for her prodigious weight, equating it with esteem.
Chapter 2
Arriving in the nearest town, Candide meets two Bulgar soldiers who force him to come with him but due to Candide’s naiveté he innocently does their bidding. After being conscripted into the army, he is trained, yet one day when out for a walk he is seized, taken back to the barracks and put on trial. The sentence passed is that he can be beaten by the regiment 36 times (running the gauntlet) or have 12 bullets put into his brain. He chooses the former but, after 3 times is near death. Fortunately the king of the Bulgars happens along and pardons him, realizing that he is “a young metaphysician, utterly ignorant of worldly matters.” The armies of the Bulgars and the Avars then clash in battle.
Voltaire explores army conscription; people were often tricked into serving and severely punished if they did not obey the rules. He also brings in the question of free will: “It did him no good to maintain that man’s will is free and that he wanted neither; he had to make a choice.” I’m not quite certain his point in this; did he deny free will and feel that fate controlled circumstances or did he accept free will but feel that it was limited by our circumstances?
Chapter 3
The two armies meet and there are 30,000 deaths from cannons, rifle-fire and bayonets. Candide decides to go away to reason about cause and effect. He encounters a burned Avar village, with scenes of carnage and molestation, and littered with body parts. In a Bulgar village he finds similar atrocities and decides to go to Holland where he would find Christians who would treat him as he was accustomed to be treated in the baron’s castle. Yet when he begs for alms he is mocked and derided. An orator who is speaking of love labels him a wretch and rejects him outright because he will not speak against the pope. Fortunately he meets Jacques, an unbaptized Anabaptist who gives him shelter, a bath, food, money and offers to teach him to manufacture Persian fabrics. Candide assume this treatment confirms the “all is best in the world” theory. On his walk the next day, he happens upon a diseased beggar.
Voltaire feelings of revulsion of the effects of war is apparent in this chapter. He uses oxymorons to get across the absurdity of war: “….. a harmony whose equal was never heard in hell,” and ” ….. during the heroic carnage,” as well as horrific scenes of slaughter. The hypocrisy of Christianity is also brought to the forefront, which is countered by Jacques, the Anabaptist.
Chapter 4
Candide discovers that the beggar is his old tutor, Pangloss, who gives him the horrific news of Cungonde’s death. Candide faints and when he recovers, Pangloss tells him that the baron and his wife and son were killed, Cungonde was raped and disembowelled and the castle razed to the ground. He blames his affliction on the baroness’ maid who infected him with syphilis, tracing the disease back to Columbus’ shipmate. Jacques pays to have Pangloss cured, the tutor only losing an ear and an eye. Two months later they must travel to Lisbon, and on the ship, Pangloss states it is all for the best but Jacques contradicts him, saying that men are not born bad but make choices that have direct bearing on their situations. Pangloss counters that individual misfortunes are for the greater good. They encounter a raging storm.
Pangloss’ reasoning with regard to him contracting the pox had some sort of weird psychological reasoning which I could not follow. Pangloss rejects that his situation could be punishment for sin or caused by evil. I did like how Jacques mentioned that,
“Men must have a corrupted nature a little, because they weren’t born wolves, yet they’ve become wolves: God didn’t give them twenty-four-pounders or bayonets, but they’ve made themselves bayonets and cannons with which to destroy each other.”
Another comment on the senselessness of war.
Chapter 5
The storm becomes perilous and Jacques is tossed into the sea (after saving a sailor who now does not attempt to save him) where he drowns. Candide wants to jump in to save him but Pangloss prevents this heroic act, explaining the harbour was designed especially for the Anabaptist to drown in. When they reach land, there is an earthquake and later, after getting dinner from some inhabitants that they assisted, an officer of the Inquisition argues with Pangloss that if all is for the best, there then can be no original sin or punishment. Pangloss argues back and they discuss free will. The officer ominously nods to his attendant.
Another instance of free will being mentioned and more of Pangloss’ philosophy. The problem of evil is touched on. Is man evil? Are things like Pangloss’ recent condition and the earthquake punishment for evil? What is purposeful and what is destiny? What can be altered and what is fate? The earthquake mentioned here is based on the real earthquake of 1755 in Lisbon.
Chapter 6
After the earthquake, the “wise men of the country” decided to have an auto-de-fe (or a ritual of public penance, during the first part of which accused heretics were sentenced by the Inquisition), and they burn people to prevent another quake. Pangloss and Candide are arrested, the former for having spoken and the latter for listening. Candide and Pangloss are forced to wear miters, Candide’s with flames pointing down and devils with no claws or tails and Pangloss’ with the flames pointing upward and devils with claws and tails. Candide was beaten to beautiful music, Pangloss was hanged and the earth trembled again. Candide begins to question the “best of worlds,” thinking of the fate of Pangloss, Jacques and Cunegonde. An old woman tells him to follow her.
Superstition seems to be a main theme of this chapter, exemplified by the auto-de-fe in hopes of avoiding another earthquake. Along with Pangloss, two men who would not eat the pork were hanged, obviously two Jews. Candide begins to question the “all is best” philosophy and he no longer has Pangloss to continually reinforce these views. What will happen to his perceptions without his friend?
Chapter 7
The woman takes him to a hovel, feeds him and he sleeps. The next evening she takes him to an isolated house where he finds Cunegonde. He is ecstatic, falling at her feet. Cunegonde tells him Pangloss’ report was true but she survived and will tell him more after he relates what has happened to him since he left the castle. He does.
There is not much to say, except to note the air of mystery in the chapter. It says Candide regards “his whole life as a nightmare, and the present moment a delightful vision.” A flair for the dramatic. Why would he regard is whole life a nightmare when he was completely happy up until the point he was evicted from the castle? I suppose it’s a devise to emphasize his overwhelming happiness at discovering Cunegonde alive.
Chapter 8
Cunegonde recounts the horrors she experienced at the hands of the Bulgars. The Bulgar captain sold her to a Jew and later, when she was noticed by the Grand Inquisitor they decided to share her, although she so far has resisted them both, as “a lady of honour may be raped once, but it strengthens her virtue.” She saw both Pangloss and Candide at the auto-de-fe and suddenly realized that Pangloss’ theory of “all is for the best” is not true. She gave her servant orders to find him and voilà! But Don Issachar, the Jew has arrived home expecting his rights.
I think Pangloss truly believed in his philosophy. Voltaire makes him almost blind to what is around him and his comments do not stem from what he actually sees (outward) but solely from what he believes (inward).
2) How do you feel about Voltaire’s writing style? Do you find this book funny or disturbing?
So far I am keeping an open mind. I have not consciously read a book as satire before, so I’m wondering if all satires are as overdone as this one is feeling. I’m finding it mostly disturbing, yet it is so contrived and theatrical, I’m honestly having trouble taking it seriously to have a feeling either way.
3) Who is your favorite character thus far?
Jacques is definitely my favourite character so far. Actually, he is the only character who has seemed like a character; the rest have been more like caricatures.
![]() |
| Tiresias appears to Odysseus Johann Heinrich Füssli (1780-1785) source Wikipedia |
Next, he encounters the soul of his dead mother, before Teiresias the Theban appears before him and speaks a prophecy: Poseidon will make his homecoming difficult. If they do not eat the cattle & sheep of Helios, they may reach Ithaka, but if they do, only Odysseus will return, he will find troubles in his household and will have to punish with violence the men who have committed treachery there. After Odysseus sets his household in order, he instructs him to go on a journey where he will meet unusual men and there make a sacrifice to Poseidon. His death will be from the sea and “unwarlike” but in old age, and his people will be prosperous. Odysseus, while he listens to the instructions, is more interested in gaining information about his mother, but Teiresias says any who he allows to drink the blood will give him answers and then he fades away. When Odysseus inquires of his mother how she met her death, she reveals that it was from pining away for him and, greived, he tries three times to embrace her but is unable to do so because of her state in death. After his mother, a catalogue of women come to him, Tyro, Antiope, Alkmene, Epikaste, etc. and the reader learns something of their history. The end of this catalogue brings Odysseus out of his story and back to the court of Alkinoös and the Phaiakians, but they urge him to continue, completely enraptured with his tales. He resumes his story of Hades, as Agamemnon steps up to the pool, lamenting the treachery of his wife and the untrustworthiness of women. Yet he then compliments the virtue and loyalty of Penelope, but cautions Odysseus to go covertly to his homeland. Achilles then comes, happy to receive information about his son. The soul of Aias, however, will not speak or approach him, still angry over the loss of Achilles’ armour to Odysseus. Odysseus tries to make restitution but Aias will have none of it and walks away. There is another catalogue of souls of men such as Minos, Orion, Tityo, Tantolos, etc . While Odysseus wishes to see more souls, a “green fear” comes upon him again and he returns to his ship.
![]() |
| Odysseus lands at the beach of Hades by Theodoor van Thulden source Wikipaintings |
![]() |
| Ulysses and the Sirens Pablo Picasso (1946) source Wikipaintings |
Book XII
![]() |
| The Siren John William Waterhouse (circa 1900) source Wikipedia |
![]() |
| A 19th century engraving of the Strait of Messina, site associated with Scylla & Charybdis source Wikipedia |
(While copying my post to my Blog, my Blogger font caused me grief and, not having the patience or the resourcefulness of Odysseus, I couldn’t fix it without a struggle, so I apologize for the lack of uniformity in this post.)
![]() |
| Odysseus in the cave of Polyphemus by Jacob Jordaens (1635) source Wikipaintings |
Odysseus then concocts a brilliant plan to tie three sheep together and have one of men hang under each of the centre sheep. In this way they all escape, but unwisely Odysseus chooses to taunt the Cyclops when they are at sea, and twice Polyphemus hurls pieces of mountains at them, causing them to be pushed back to shore. Eventually they escape, but not before Polyphemus calls on his father, Poseidon, and prophecies death or troubles for Odysseus.
![]() |
| Ulysses deriding Polyphemus by William Turner (1848) source Wikipaintings |
Hospitality
The Cyclops does not recognize the code of hospitality. Is this because his father is a god and he does not have to worry about offending them? I don’t think so, based on what has happened to other children of gods. Are they reasonably remote and usually do not have to worry about visitors, because of their hideous appearance and deviant behaviour? This is puzzling.
Crafty-Odysseus
Yet again, Odysseus proves his ingenuity and bravery in the face of huge odds and terrifying circumstances. His speeches to the Cyclops were touched with manipulation, falsity and daring. His quick thinking and careful planning were instrumental in their escape. Considering his stubborn refusal to leave in the first place because he wanted presents, his actions were well considered, however he still caused the death of some of his men.
King or Leader
Originally I had thought of Odysseus as the king of Ithaka, but even if this term has been used, I’m beginning to conclude that it was a loose term. As I read on, I wonder if he could be more accurately described as a type of leader. There are instances of him refusing to listen to his men, such as the case of mocking the Cyclops and not leaving the island without gifts; yet there are also cases where his men don’t listen to him, as when he urges that they leave after the first battle with the Kikonians and, because of their stubbornness, end up in another battle and are subjected to casualties. Does this behaviour make the suitors behaviour at home less surprising? What was Odyssey’s role in his own country?
![]() |
| Approximate location of the Kikonians source Wikipedia |
They arrive at the Aiolian island where Hippotas’ son, Aiolos lives. For one month he entertains Odysseus and his men and then gifts him with a bag “stuffed full inside with the courses of all the blowing winds” upon his departure. But lo, as the ships finally spy their homeland, the men begin to grumble about the greater portion of spoils that Odysseus has in his possession. While Odysseus sleeps from exhaustion because he would not permit anyone but himself to handle the ship, the men unwittingly release the winds which wildly blow them back to the island of Aiolos. In spite of Odysseus’ pleadings relating to the foolishness of his men, Aiolos is appalled to see them and sends them away, astounded that the gods are so much against them. Sailing, on the seventh day, they reach the citadel of Lamos and three people are sent off to scout. They encounter the daughter of Antiphates who sends them to her house, but there stands a woman as tall as a mountain, and when Antiphates materializes, he snatches up one man and prepares to eat him for dinner, while the rest flee back to the ships. The king raises the alarm throughout the city and these giants begin to hurl boulders at the ships, and spear men like fish as they go. Only Odysseus’ ship escapes and they reach the island of Aiaia, where Circe, the goddess who speak with royals and the daughter of Helios, lives. Odysseus and Eurylochos draw lots to determine who will reconnoitre the island and Eurylochos sets off with his men. When they find the house of Circe and she invites them inside; Eurylochos is the only one who refuses, suspecting treachery. His surmise is correct as Circe proceeds to lead the men into pig pens and transform them into pigs. Eurylochos hastens back to tell Odysseus of his mens’ sorry fate. Odysseus decides to face Circe on his own and on his way he meets Hermes who tells him how to best the goddess and gives him medicine to help counteract her potion. When Circe hands him the drink, he swallows it and, leaping up, draws his sword and springs at her as if to kill her.
![]() |
| Tilla Durieux als Circe by Franz von Stuck (1913) source Wikimedia Commons |
Astounded that the mixture has had no affect on him, she invites him into her bed, whereupon he forces her to swear that she will practice no more treachery upon him. She washes him, yet he refuses to eat before she sets his men free, which she does with a command to go back to his camp to bring back the rest of his companions. They cry and weep for joy when they see Odysseus return, but Eurylochos attempts to prevent the men from visiting Circe; Odysseus contemplates killing him but is restrained by his men, and Eurylochos, afraid of being left behind, follows.
![]() |
| Circe by Wright Barker (1889) source Wikimedia Commons |
For a year, they feast daily on “unlimited meat and sweet wine,” until Odysseus cannot bear it and clasps Circe’s knees, begging her to allow them to resume their journey. She agrees but imparts a surprising stipulation: Odysseus must visit the house of Hades and speak with the soul of Teiresias the Theban and blind prophet before his quest may continue. She gives him directions and instructions for sacrifice when he arrives there, then sets him on his way.
Leadership
Is it my imagination or is the chain of command seriously compromised? First, upon sight of their homeland, the crew becomes jealous of Odysseus’ spoils, and secretly opens the bag of the winds, which blow them back to where they started. Their envy of his treasures is palpable and their actions, mutinous.
Eurylochos, in spite of being elected leader of the reconnaissance expedition to Circe’s house, chooses not to go inside with his men. Was that jettisoning his leadership responsibilities? Did the men refuse to listen to his guidance? And when he was the only one to make it back to the ship, he was a nervous wreck, refusing to return, even when Odysseus came for them, assuring them everything was alright and that Eurylochos’ men were restored to their origin form. Odysseus wants to decapitate him for his insolence and has to be restrained. Was this because Eurylochos attempts to influence the men directly, without speaking to Odysseus first?
Either they are suffering from a slow breakdown of leadership, or the society of Ithaka is sufficiently lawless that there is room made for actions that challenge the chain of command.
Hospitality
The breach of xenia, or the tradition of guest-host hospitality, continues. The Phaiakians disliked strangers and entertaining them, the Cyclops wanted to make meals of them and mocked that his “gift” to Odysseus was that he would eat him last, and now the Laistrygonians attempt to eat them, and Circe turns them into pigs. Are these lands so far from mainland Greece that they don’t recognize this tradition?
![]() |
| Ulysses at the Palace of Circe by Wilhelm van Ehrenburg (1667) source Wikimedia Commons |
” ……….. Now, therefore, bend thine ear
To supplication; hear his sighs, though mute;
Unskilful with what words to pray, let me
Interpret for him, me his advocate
And propitiation; all his works on me,
Good or not good, ingraft; my merit those
Shall perfect, and for these my death shall pay.” (30 – 36)
God accepts His Son’s sacrifice but divulges that they must leave Paradise as they are tainted with sin. They have lost Happiness and Immortality which are replaced by the “final remedy,” Death.
” …………….. so Death becomes
His final remedy, and after life
Tried in sharp tribulation, and refined
By faith and faithful works, to second life.” (61 – 64)
Sadly, man now knows both good and evil when he should have been content to know good only.
God commissions the angel Michael to take from among the Cherubim “flaming warriors” and return to to the Garden to evict the luckless couple, yet if they are obedient, he will reveal a new covenant to them.
As Michael prepares to descend, Adam tells Eve he anticipates that God will hear their prayers and that they will live instead of perish. Though she feels herself unworthy of forgiveness, she is grateful for the pardon and suggests they live in the Garden “though in fallen state, content.” Yet Adam anticipates that they have not understood all the changes that will arise from their fall and with his assumption, down comes Michael “from a sky of jasper,” “a glorious apparition.” He indeed confirms that their humble prayers were heard and that “one bad act with many good deeds well-done may’st cover.” However he cannot allow them to remain in Paradise.
Adam laments, “heart-struck, with chilling gripe of sorrow stood, that all his senses bound”; and Eve cries her protest. But Michael gives her a response that is at once wise and universal:
“Lament not, Eve, but patiently resign
What justly thou hast lost, nor set thy heart
Thus overfond, on that which is not thine.” (287 – 289)
Adam shares his fear that he will no longer be able to be close to God, yet Michael comforts him.
“Yet doubt not but in valley and in plain
God is as here, and will be found alike
Present, and of his presence many a sign
Still following thee, still compassing thee round
With goodness and paternal love …..” (349 – 353)
Michael then takes Adam up the hill of Paradise to show him all the torment, tragedy, hatred, violence, misery and disease that will be a result of their sin. He sees Cain and Abel; death and sorrow. Adam despairs, whereupon Michael gives him advice for living: “the rule of not too much, by temperance taught,” “nor love thy life nor hate, but what thou liv’st live well; how long or short permit to Heaven.” He relates the story of Noah and how God promises never to destroy the Earth again by flood.
![]() |
| Adam, Eve and the archangel Michael by Gustave Doré |
Still revealing the future, Michael discourses on how the “second source of men” will have the judgement fresh in their minds and therefore will exist peacefully for a long time until Nimrod builds the Tower of Babel to reach to Heaven and God punishes him, visiting on the people a confusion of language and cacophonous din. Appalled, Adam censures the attempt of man to dominate man, as it was never in God’s plan; birds, beasts, fish and fowl were to be in subjection of man, yet “man over men he made not lord” instead intending “human left from human free.” Michael agrees, stating:
“……….. Justly though abhorr’st
That son, who on the quiet state of men
Such trouble brought, affecting to subdue
Rational liberty; yet know withal,
Since thy original lapse, true liberty
Is lost, which always with right reason dwells
Twinned, and from her hath no dividual being
Reason in Man obscured, or not obeyed,
Immediately inordinate desires
And upstart passions catch the government
From Reason, and to servitude reduce
Man, till then free. Therefore, since he permits
Within himself unworthy owers to reign
Over free reason, God, in judgement just,
Subjects him from without to violent lords,
Who oft as undeservedly enthral
His outward freedom. Tyranny must be,
Though to the tyrant thereby no excuse.
Yet sometimes nations will decline so low
From virtue, which is reason, that no wrong,
But justice, and some fatal curse annexed,
Their inward lost …………..” (79 – 101)
After Noah, men begin to worship idols and slavery ensues, yet God calls Abraham, the blessed patriarch, and through his line a “Great Deliverer” will come who will “bruise the Serpent’s head.” Michael’s speech continues through Moses. When Adam asks why “so many laws and so many sins among them; how can God with such reside?”, the angel explains “law was given them, to evince their natural pravity”. His narrative progresses through the Old Testament to the Messiah whereupon Adam rejoices at the coming conqueror yet Michael corrects his misconception. Salvation will not be obtained by battle but by “obedience and by love, through love alone fulfil the Law”; Christ will defeat Sin and Death, then Earth “shall all be Paradise, far happier place than this of Eden, and far happier days.” Adam asks if he should repent of his sin or rejoice at the good that will spring from it and who will be the guide for God’s people. Michael says God will send His Spirit and also there is the Church but he goes on to warn about false teachers full of ambition, superstitions and traditions that will “taint”, using the Church to gain wealth and secular power. Corruption will reign:
“……….. Yet many will presume,
Whence heavy persecution shall arise
Of all who in the worship persevere
Of Spirit and Truth; the rest, far greater part,
Will deem in outward rites and specious forms
Religion satisfied; Truth shall retire
Bestuck with slanderous darts, and works of Faith
Rarely be found; so shall the World go on,
To good malignant, to bad men benign,
Under her own weight groaning ……” (530 – 538)
…. until the return of the Lord. Michael instructs Adam to:
“………………… Only add
Deeds to thy knowledge answerable; add faith;
Add virtue, patience, temperance; add love,
By name to come called Charity, the soul
Of all the rest: then wilt thou not be loth
To leave this Paradise, but shalt possess
A Paradise within thee, happier far.” (581 – 587)
Adam wakes Eve who has been consoled in her dream by the hope of her seed to come. Michael takes one of their hands in each of his and then leads them from the Garden of Paradise:
“Some natural tears they dropped, but wiped them soon;
The world was all before them, where to choose
Their place of rest, and Providence their guide;
They, hand in hand, with wandering steps and slow,
Through Eden took their solitary way.” (645 – 649)
![]() |
| The Explusion of Adam & Eve from Paradise by Benjamin West (1791) source Wikipaintings |
Wow, what a marathon ending! These last two books appeared rushed to me; Milton packed nearly the whole Old Testament teachings into these two books/chapters. Again, I’m not an expert in poetry, but the sound, tone and pacing of the poem did not feel as grand, as beautiful or as skilfully woven, when compared to the rest. There were certainly brilliant moments, but only snacks here and there instead of the smorgasbord to which we’ve become accustomed. In fact, it is certainly ironic that these two chapters were so packed with information, yet I’m having to think harder to find areas of the poem to comment on.
When Michael showed Adam the future, he gave him images in book XI but only narrative in Book XII. Was this because Adam would be overwhelmed by the visual evidence of the results of their sin? Or is it simply the structure Milton chose for the poem?
For the first time, I noted a commentary on his own times inserted into the text, and his push for a “rational liberty.” (see above, Book XII, lines 79 – 101) However as interesting as it was, again I felt it was rushed or inserted before the poem end, a pet topic that Milton felt the need to bring to the forefront.
Historically, there are so many Paradise Lost paintings/engravings of stern angels pointing the way out of Heaven, and Adam and Eve running like stricken and tragic sinners, yet actually the angel gave them hope and then gently led them out of the Garden. Within a destructive, disastrous, heartbreaking circumstance, Milton did a spectacular job of revealing hope and restoration without altering their condition, a lovely combination of encouragement, pathos and reality.
Not only can I not believe that I’ve come to the end of this read, I can’t believe that I waited so long to read it. Milton’s verse is so grand and beautiful! I will definitely read this again in the very near future. Final review to come ………….
![]() |
| Milton dictated to his daughters the (Paradise Lost) Eugene Delacroix source Wikipaintings |
I have begun reading through Émile Zola’s Rougon-Macquart series, already having completed The Fortune of the Rougons and Son Excellence, Eugène Rougon. My next book is La Curée, which I had planned to start soon. Well, imagine my surprise and delight when I stumbled upon Fanda Classiclit’s Zoladdiction challenge for April 2014! Of course, I didn’t even have to think to decide to participate.
How to join?
So, how Zoladdicted are you? Will you join? 😉
Silver-Tongued Odysseus
In the previous chapter, Odysseus charmed Nausikaa with his gallant words, causing her to wish for him as a husband over all Phaiakians, even though he is a foreigner in their land. When he meets Alkinoös and Arete, he must take even greater care because he had earlier met their daughter, causing her to make “friends with a man without being formally married.” Yet Odysseus tells them the truth, while sweetening his words with an irresistible charm that does not fail to enchant the king and queen. The king offers Nausikaa’s hand in marriage, along with property and respect among the people
Identity & Crafty-Odysseus
Odysseus has yet to reveal his identity. I wonder why he feels the need to conceal himself. He also cleverly avoids answering Alkinoös’ offer of his daughter.
Themes:
![]() |
| Odysseus at the Palace of Alkinoös Francesco Hayez (1814 – 1815) source Wikipedia |
Alkinoös takes Odysseus to an assembly and Athene, this time in the guise of a man, goes throughout the city encouraging people to come to learn about the stranger. Alkinoös counsels the people to help Odysseus on his journey, and then calls for Demodokos, the singer, upon whom the Muse had visited both good and evil, removing his sight but gifting him with a sweet singing voice (is he modelled after Homer?). He sings of the quarrel between Odysseus and Peleus’ son, Achilles, and how great Agamemnon was pleased, for the prophecy Apollo had spoken to him was fulfilled, signifying the beginning of evil for the Trojans. Odysseus weeps uncontrollably, burying his head in his mantle and it seems Alkinoös understands his anguish. He suggests that they have fulfilled their desire for lyre and feasting and now they should have contests to test speed and strength, so Odysseus can recount their prowess when he returns home. Laodamas, son of Alkinoös, at Euryalos’ urging, challenges Odysseus, who is offended at his intemperate words. When Euryalos further angers him, he becomes rather heated and defends himself:
“Friend, that was not well-spoken; you seem like one who is reckless.
So it is that the gods do not bestow graces in all ways
on men, neither in stature nor yet in brains or eloquence;
for there is a certain kind of man, less noted for beauty,
but the god puts comeliness on his words, and they who look toward him
are filled with joy at the sight, and he speaks to them without faltering
in winning modesty, and shines among those who are gathered,
and people look on him as on a god when he walks in the city.
Another again in his appearance is like the immortals,
but upon his words there is not grace distilled, as in your case
the appearance is conspicuous, and not a god even
would make it otherwise, and yet the mind there is worthless.
Now you have stirred up anger deep in the breast within me
by this disorderly speaking …….” (166 – 179)
Rising, he grabs a discus and far out throws anyone who has yet competed. He then boasts of other feats he is capable of, and mentions the Trojan country where he was; when he finishes his speech, all men are “stricken to silence.” To lower the tension, Alkinoös suggests dancing with more story-telling, and Odysseus watches the performance, at the end conceding the superiority of their dancers with an eloquence and diplomacy that wins admiration. Alkinoös promises gifts to Odysseus, and even Euryalos gives him a sword. Nausikaa reminds him of her rescue of him, and wishes for his kind thoughts of her in his homeland, whereupon he charms her again with words and finally he offers Demodokos the best portion of his meat. The singer, pleased, begins to sing of the Argives and their means of gaining the inner city of Troy inside the Trojan horse. Once more Odysseus sobs his heart out in sorrow, and Alkinoös, watching, finally directly asks for his history.
Fame and Glory
The Phaiakians were looking to win the admiration of Odysseus with their contests but, when it becomes apparent he can best them at most sport, they then turn to dancing, an area in which they prove their supremacy. They want him to carry home a tale of an exploit in which they could impress foreigners.
Identity
Still Odysseus conceals his identity and, instead, strategically employs diplomatic and persuasive speech to win their respect. His survival, in this case, perhaps does not depend on weapons, but tact and ingenuity. His politeness reflects much more on his character than actions. After hearing the Phaiakian songs of the Trojan War sung by Demodokos, will Odysseus feel more comfortable with revealing himself?
The Phaiakians
These are a curious people and are difficult to characterize. Their kingdom is far away from others, and they do not seem to welcome strangers in the same manner as other countries. They are not completely unsophisticated, yet there are clues that they are not as advanced as other nations. A prime example of this is when Euryalos almost apologizes for his gift sword being merely made of bronze, but then points out that the handle is silver and the scabbard of ivory. Could their possible inferiority also be the reason that they want Odysseus to carry home a story of their aptitude and excellence in a respected arena, such as sports or dancing?
![]() |
| Nausicaa Frederic Layton (1878) source Wikipedia |
“Was she beautiful or not beautiful?”
Gwendolyn Harleth is a “spoiled child”, a young woman with average prospects yet with high hopes of attaining respectable social standing and monetary comfort. While scorning the traditional avenues of marriage, she desperately wishes for a meaningful, vibrant life, even though she is unsure of how to attain it. Gambling, parties and equestrian amusements, fill her time, with little thought of other peoples wants, needs or struggles.
Daniel Deronda is a respectable moral young man and the ward of Sir Hugo Mallinger. When he first spies Gwendolyn, his disapproval of her gambling and later, the same quiet censure of some of her actions, leads her down a path of introspection and causes her to question the manner in which she is living her life. Yet the changes in her character do not come soon enough and, due to her family’s sudden monetary troubles, she contracts a marriage to Henleigh Mallinger Grandcourt, the nephew and heir of Sir Hugo. She views the marriage as an escape from poverty and a stepping stone to a life of leisure and a respectable position in society. Instead she gets a husband with a twisted soul, bent on breaking her will as he would a horse or a wild animal. He glories in her struggles, fear and his ability to control her actions.
![]() |
| Gwendolyn at the Roulette Table (1910) Wikipedia |
A second plot winds itself through Gwendolyn’s, as Deronda internally questions the manner of his birth and the identity of his parents. Not wishing to bring up a subject that may be uncomfortable for Sir Hugo, he suppresses his curiosity, yet aches for familial connections and history. Upon saving a Jewish singer from drowning, his relationship with her takes him down the path of finding his true heritage.
Eliot forces the reader to examine some of the social issues of that time. Without money, young women could only hope to find work in low paying positions, such as governesses or companions, or perhaps choose less respectful avenues as singers or actresses. Without an inheritance or a family who was financially able to support them, an advantageous marriage was really the only protection for women of this time period.
She also treats the subject of Jewish identity and culture with surprising dexterity and perception. While they are portrayed with an obvious sympathy, Eliot makes each character real, from the philosophic and idealistic Mordecai, to the money-loving pawnbroker, Cohen. The struggle of a people against prejudice and pre-judgement is plainly explored with touching sincerity and insight. Mordecai’s longing to see the Zionist hopes for a Jewish homeland established adds a deeper more complex examination of an issue that was of particular interest to the author.
![]() |
| The Fair Toxophilites (Archers) by William Firth (1872) Wikimedia Commons |
I found that certain parts of the novel dragged, and the plot suffered numerous bumps, but again Eliot tackled such diverse issues, making the writing of the novel an epic task, so I can forgive some of the inconsistencies. Her obvious intellectual curiosity, and her enlightened opinions made the read informative as well as enjoyable. Daniel Deronda is a book that prods you to think and ponder even after the last page is turned.
“In the chequered area of human experience the seasons are all mingled as in the golden age: fruit and blossom hang together,; in the same moment the sickle is reaping and the seed is sprinkled; one tends the green cluster and another treads the wine-press. Nay, in each of our lives harvest and spring-time are continually one, until Death himself gathers us and sows us anew in his invisible fields.”
Fidelity
It appears that Odysseus initially stayed willingly with Kalypso, living with her as a husband. Yet as time passed, her charms wore off until he was sorrowfully pining to return home to his wife and country. In Greek culture, a man who had an affair with a foreigner or slave was not viewed as being unfaithful.
The Assistance of the Gods
Curiously, though the gods choose to help certain mortals, in most cases their assistance is deliberately limited. They appear to offer just enough help to allow the person to use their ingenuity, strength and perseverance to get themselves out of a dire situation or to learn a specific lesson.
Observations
Odysseus has been shipwrecked by Poseidon twice; he has had two monologues; he has had two helpers; and he climbs back into his boat twice. What does this mean? I have no idea ….. 😉
| Hermes Ordering Calypso to Release Odysseus by Gerald de Lairesse (1670) Wikimedia Commons |
As Odysseus sleeps on remote Phaiakia, Athene comes to Nausikaa, the daughter of king Alkinoös, in a dream, urging her to carry the washing in her father’s wagon down to the river to wash. When she obeys the next day, Odysseus himself emerges from the bushes, naked but for a branch. All her handmaidens scatter in terror, yet Nausikaa bravely questions him and finds he is a stranger to their country. Employing his admirable tact and intelligence, Odysseus charms the girl. She lends him some garments, waits while he washes and then instructs him to go to the palace of her parents, to grasp her mother’s knees in supplication and thus will he get assistance for his journey. He prays to Athene that the reception of the Phaiakians will be favourable.
Feasting
There are numerous scenes of feasting throughout the poem. If a stranger arrives, a feast is prepared, often before his name is learnt or his circumstances; if he stays, there is more feasting; there is feasting upon his departure; when the gods visit each other, they feast, such as the preparations made by Kalypso for Hermes when he arrived with his message. In the case of mortals, the feasting is accompanied by sacrifices to the gods.
Hospitality
I am beginning to wonder if the hospitality and reverence offered to guests are not necessarily out of the goodness of the heart of the host. Whenever a stranger appears, they are never completely certain if they are entertaining a mortal or a god. It seems like good sense to treat everyone like a god and therefore be certain that they haven’t offended one and that no dreadful punishment will follow for lack of generosity.
![]() |
| The Meeting of Odysseus and Nausicaa by Jacob Jordaens Wikimedia Commons (How Nausicaa and her handmaidens were able to get ahold of 19th century clothing is a mystery!) |
Piety
During the short time Telemachos and Athene spend on Pylos, Nestor has two sacrificial feasts to the gods. The detailed explanation of these offerings shows Nestor’s piety and generosity. His devoted worship of the gods is perhaps one of the reasons he was able to return home from Troy with very few delays, unlike the rest of the Achaians.
![]() |
| Telemachus departing from Nestor by Henry Howard source Wikipedia |
Fame and Glory
Menelaos states that he would gladly be happy with one-third of the riches he returned with, if only it would bring back the fallen heroes of the war. Spoils and riches are equated with glory in this culture and it is interesting that he would not give up everything for his fallen comrades. Fame and glory can often be more important than life itself.
Trust and Betrayal
The interaction between Menelaos and Helen seems at once, comfortable and strained. Each tell a conflicting story about Helen’s actions during the end of the war, and it is apparent that her husband does not believe her rendition. After 10 years, they have learned to live together but trust is certainly lacking. Is Helen telling the truth? After such a long time, Helen’s character is still elusive.
A King and His Kingdom
Penelope, half pleading with, half scolding the suitors says:
“…….. Nor have you listened to what you heard from your fathers before you, when you were children, what kind of man Odysseus was among your own parents, how he did not act and spoke no word in his own country that was unfair …..”
Odysseus has been gone so long that the suitors have never known him personally, and this is partly from where their disrespectful attitudes stem. Their king is like a myth or dream, and there is nothing to tie their allegiance to him, except stories passed down from their elders.
Piety
Menelaos, when recounting his adventures in Egypt, reveals that the reason for his long detour was that he had neglected to render complete hecatombs (offerings) to the gods, angering them. This is in contrast to Nestor, who made the proper sacrifices and arrives home quickly and safely.
![]() |
| Telemachus in the Palace of Menelaos 1886 source Wikimedia Commons |