Oh, Montaigne! What a character! I’m reading a series of recommended essays, and my plan is to split them into three posts. So far my introduction to Montaigne has been pleasurable, but taxing to the brain. His language and progression of ideas, examples and testimonies are not for the faint of heart. In hindsight, it was wise to take him in measured doses.
On Sadness: I felt that Montaigne was saying that the deepest sorrows often could not be expressed with outward emotions. But then he ended by saying that he is little bothered by such violent passions; I then wonder what gives him the authority to speak on sorrow if he knows nothing of it. Hmmmm ……..
 |
| The Death of Socrates Jacques-Louis David source Wikipedia |
To Think As A Philosopher Is To Learn To Die: Yikes! Another death essay. Montaigne emphasizes the need to learn to lose the fear of death. Death is inescapable and it is a piteous error to try to avoid it by any means, as the hour is determined for everyone. He tosses in Socrates rather wise and pithy remark: to the man who said “The thirty tyrants have sentence you to death,” Socrates replied, “And Nature to them.”
Of The Powers of Imagination: I’m somewhat perplexed as to where to begin with this one. This essay is supposed to (I believe) explore the relationship of imagination to the mind and body, but Montaigne rather vividly gets into a discussion of the “male member” and “passing wind”. I was laughing so hard I was crying at the end of the “passing wind” section. I don’t think hilarity was intended by the author. 😉 Apparently though, people in Montaigne’s time wouldn’t have blinked an eye at these references, showing that they were much more mature and less sensitive than modern people. And since I was very surprised by his frankness given the era, it also demonstrates that our preconceived ideas can be less than accurate.
On Educating Children: I have an interest in education, so this essay was perhaps the most interesting for me, if not the most amusing (see above). Montaigne felt that an instructor of good moral character and sound understanding was much more valuable than one with founts of knowledge. He emphasized the value of knowledge for its own sake, and was repelled by the thought that learning should be used to earn profit. The ancient Greeks would understand his dismay; only slaves were schooled to work, not free men. Montaigne proceeds to say that he does not wish for an educational system that makes children parrot back what they have learned but rather that they are taught to make ideas their own. He then expands his argument to suggest tossing out the classical education model in place of simply teaching children to philosophize. He seems to forget that the classical model contains the building blocks that give the student the tools to be able to discuss topics philosophically, not to mention that young minds have to mature to be able to understand the abstract concepts which are required in philosophy. He supports, as well, exercise and entertainment, but suggests training peculiarities and eccentricities out of people, as they are “a foe to intercourse and companionship of others”. Well, okay ……. I do understand Montaigne’s main point though. He is advocating for the teaching of a virtuous character over that of intellectual learning. In fact, this should be the goal of every teacher, however I believe that there should be a balance between the two, whereas Montaigne seems to want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
 |
| The Return of the Prodigal Son Bartolome Esteban Murillo source Wikiart |
On the Affection of Fathers for Their Children: In this case, Montaigne means male children but he does share some good advice. A man should not marry too early and responsible thought should be given to the purpose of having children, realizing that they will owe you much more than they can ever pay back. Instead of forcing the son to be dependent on him when he comes of age, the father should share his wealth and guide him in the use of it, teaching the son to run the estate. Now Montaigne claims if this is not done, the sons have no other recourse than to become thieves, a habit that will be nearly impossible to break. I’m not sure I follow his rationale in this case, and cannot agree with it as an excuse, but hey, it’s Montaigne, right? It just doesn’t feel normal if he doesn’t hit you with some sort of idiosyncratic reasoning.
Great review with some wonderful amère lucidité (sharp clearsightedness) on your part!
Death: after reading your comments my thoughts went to uplifting Cicero who embraced every day feeling privileged and fortuante to be alive and when the time comes… to go with `unfurlled sails to a port of save refuge´, death.
Imagination: Montaigne was popular. He broke a taboo. He wrote openly about everyday observations including faltulance and the´crown jewels´!
Father-son relationship: As I recall Montaigne´s father did leave the estate to him to run but M. didn´t feel he was prepared to do it. He had no choice. I´m sure he preferred to sit in his turret reading room with his best friends, books.
Education: Montaigne experinced a very strict ´latin´ based education enforced on him by his father. Perhaps this explains his ´baby with the bathwater´ reaction to education. Just study what you like and think. It´s not so easy or practical as it sounds!
You did a great job w/ this one. I'm still working on mine. I got the same results as you on all of these. Did not really agree with him w/ the fathering thing.
Ah, Cicero! He is indeed an eloquent rhetorician!
I got the impressed that Montaigne liked the way that he was educated. Latin was actually his first language and he learned it immersion-style, which he advocates in his "On Education" essay. His education was in the style that he is proposing, so at least he was intimately familiar with his subject. I've read elsewhere that his learning took about 15 hours per day, so unless he REALLY loved it, it must have been very taxing. I see his education coming out in his writing; he is rich with ideas, but his delivery is not always structured or well-planned. It makes him a little hard to follow sometimes and he appears to occasionally contradict himself, but his delivery also makes him unique. A very interesting man!
When I first started reading these essays, my first thought was "oh, no!". But since I've read a number of them now, I'm having a grand old time. He's got so much to say and I like to ponder his ideas and try to follow his thought process.
I'm discovering that there is usually something in each essay that I don't agree with BUT, at the same time he has a number of wonderful ideas and points. I'm contemplating how I can agree and disagree at the same time. It's quite an unusual experience.
I was assigned several of Montaigne's essays in college for one of my classes years ago but found him extremely difficult to read and skipped it. Let's just say, that I didn't do very well in that course. :/
You've encouraged me give him another chance though. I especially like his views on death.
The language and structure are not the easiest to understand, but if you keep plugging along, it does get easier. I'm sure I didn't pick up all his points — he has lots of them and inject tons of examples — but he feeds you enough philosophy to keep you chewing on it for quite awhile. It's also helpful that you can read an essay and then have a break. I find I need that break to allow his whirlwind of ideas to settle.
Ah, death …….. historical views on it always interest me, because I think the views have changed radically over the centuries. I'd love to read some of his contemporaries views on it.
I'm happy that I've encouraged you to perhaps re-encounter Montaigne. This time I think that you might be able to become friends! 😉